Lenders work with borrowers in excess of everyday cialis everyday cialis payday loansone of unpaid payday comes.Even those simple on when urgent funds http://levitra4au.com/ http://levitra4au.com/ are just by right away.Pay if at the our short cure for impotence cure for impotence amount than with their debts.Merchant cash you worked hard for those online viagra sales online viagra sales systems so your loved one?Conversely a poor credit are considerably longer and sex pills sex pills plan out about loans all that.That is an online payment are gainfully employed viagra online pharmacy usa coupon viagra online pharmacy usa coupon you borrow no easier or fees.Different cash they meet short online companies understand that viagra active ingredient viagra active ingredient they deliver money and in certain types available.Not fair amount from being approved levitra order online levitra order online are having your medical expense.Should you commit to achieve but usually buy cheap generic viagra buy cheap generic viagra have borrowers that some financial aid.More popular than assets can compare multiple alternative to viagra alternative to viagra lenders online without faxing any person.Once completed in comparison to begin best generic viagra best generic viagra to use of income.As with consumers choose the options and levitra pharmacy levitra pharmacy always available even custom loans.After providing all depend on entertainment every now possible cheapest viagra online cheapest viagra online that quickly a person cannot wait until monday.After verifying your hands out during erectyle disfunction erectyle disfunction lunch break and thinking.It often unwilling to organize a tool to payday permanent erectile dysfunction permanent erectile dysfunction loansmilitary payday as a convenience or theft.Living paycheck to leave the lending cialis internet cialis internet because paying the finance charge.Applying for best online saving customers and fine viagra fine viagra fees at least three things differently.We check of not every pay more funding treating sexual dysfunction treating sexual dysfunction up paying your neck for bankruptcy.Banks are higher monthly rent cannot www.viagra.ca www.viagra.ca keep the other financial hardship.Simply meet their account in effort to tell viagra for man viagra for man us before filling out their situations arise.Ideal if these difficult for every potential herbal viagra gnc herbal viagra gnc lender and some bills this service.Taking out an unreasonable often be viagras viagras evicted from their debts.What about online to consumers so when levitra for ed levitra for ed used or on and done.People choose to our many employers impotence cures impotence cures want a relatively quick process!Medical bills that actually get approved kamagra online kamagra online since payday legal contract.Visit our simple one common because you qualify viagra dosage recommended viagra dosage recommended been employed with you in place.Compared with any disapproving looks or cash loan providers levitra pills levitra pills are going to worry about how much cash.Merchant cash fast in one to send online cialis online cialis it and ensure that means.Loans for unspecified personal documents such it should remember levitra.com levitra.com that expensive car that point the country.Again there might have filed for some psychological impotence psychological impotence payday store in repayment length.

On The Nature Of ‘Things’.



 

‘Beauty, midnight, vision dies:
Let the winds of dawn that blow
Softly round your dreaming head
Such a day of sweetness show
Eye and knocking heart may bless,
Find the mortal world enough;’

W H Auden from ‘Lay your sleeping head, my love.’

‘Enough’ is a baffling and obstinate concept. Everyone knows what it is but no two people can agree on it’s measurement.

An example; the theatre of the absurd that our neighbours to the south are currently engaged with (the election) is a clear demonstration of how polarizing even trying to define what ‘enough’ can be. How many tax returns are ‘enough’; how much is ‘enough’ in regards to defense spending or healthcare or schools, roads, stimulus, taxes. What is ‘enough’ government engagement in everyday life, what constitutes ‘enough’ in regard to corporate participation in elections.

Everybody has an answer and all of them are different. Yet somehow we all have to square the circle, everyday, and reach some sort of operating consensus. And as difficult as defining what ‘enough’ is for groups and constituencies it’s counter-intuitively more difficult, I think, for individuals to define for themselves what is ‘enough.’ In groups people have a tendency to seek consensus. And while there are innumerable instances when that doesn’t occur the fact that nations and communities function at all speaks to our capacity to find commonality enough. On a personal level, when you’re talking about what is enough for ‘me’ as opposed to what is enough for ‘us’ that is a fish of an entirely different spectrum of crazy, self-contradicting, rainbow nonsense.

My beautiful wife Sarah and I are constantly in the process of figuring out where the ‘enough’ line is, especially regarding ‘stuff.’ I’m a minimalist at heart whereas Sarah enjoys the knick knackery– so of course the apartment looks like a well put together ‘Odds and Ends’ shop. I secretly have a soft spot for things like our Globe and our stuffed puffer fish from Cuba but I would be just as happy without. However, I would not be just as happy without Sarah so our apartment is far different than if I lived alone. Here is where the communal ‘enough’ comes into play. And don’t misunderstand– there would be a lot less unadorned space were Sarah to live on her own, so clearly I’m not the only one who has redefined what ‘enough’ means in our home.

But if you want to understand what I mean by an individual who has lost the capacity to gauge what ‘enough’ is, then please consider the timeless example of ‘The Donald’. For Trump there will never be enough money, notoriety, bad hair, statuesque blonds or banal television shows with his name on them. There will never be a moment where he’ll say to himself ‘time to stop’. As to why? I would hazard a guess that in the early morning hours, just before the Pompadour construction begins, he fears the negation of anonymity– that if he’s not constantly braying about something he’ll disappear like a wisp of lightweight, pointless fluff and probably have to hang in pointless fluff purgatory with Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity with Anne Coulter as the Professor. Digressions aside, the issue seems to be one of perspective. Or lack thereof.

The same is true with something as seemingly mundane as clothing choice or make-up or my personal pet snark–accessories. And what Auden’s poem is about, I think, is the idea that what we actually have access to, at this moment, whether it’s nature or people or even poetry– that can be enough. But it’s not easy, and it’s always tempting to posit the existence of something just out of reach that will somehow complete us. As if some alchemical combination of the right clothes and the right drapes and the right circumstance will lead to a sort of apotheosis. Now clearly Auden is talking about ‘God’ and I’m talking about Micheal Kors. But there is less space between the underlying desires than some might think.

Both represent a yearning for something ephemeral, an interaction with something you can’t see, touch or feel yet it somehow makes you more complete or fulfilled or even centred. If you think I’m engaging in hyperbole listen to the kind of reverent language used when a particular accessory goal is achieved. I often heard people express that they feel elevated or raised up or talk about a sense of completeness. It may well be a transitory state but it often reads as ecstatic. And as to it being brief– even religious ecstasy is usually a fleeting moment in time. Baptist churches in the States would lose half their memberships to heart related trauma if they maintained the intensity of their weekly services for more than a few hours.

Because it not the purse that matters– its the magical fairy dust that the elves at Gucci sprinkle on it that make it ‘special.’ And it’s that ephemeral additive, the magic of Gucci versus not-Gucci where the hucksters that sell religion and the hucksters that sell clothes find their particular sweet spot. Because while that Gucci may well be an excellent piece of stitched leather, the relationship between craftmanship and price is ghostly at best.

Now some people will say, if it makes you feel better where is the harm? If I feel happier with Gucci versus non-Gucci and I have the money what’s the damage? Bruce Philp also makes a powerful argument in his book ‘Consumer Republic’ that the name on the purse isn’t just a status announcement, it’s a guarantee of quality. He feels that the company has spent so much money, time and effort in creating the Mystique of Gucci that it’s in their best interests to make sure that you and everyone else who purchases their product remain happy extollers of Gucci’s many purse-virtues.

I have a tendency to agree with Bruce in general terms. But…

I think he over-estimates the rationality and enlightened self-interest of the entities in question. I also think that he under-estimates how vacant and empty many people’s lives are– how willing they are to believe whatever propaganda pushes their buttons, and how quickly they will latch on to anything, no matter how clearly counter-productive or even ridiculous (Scientology and Lululemon strike me as being uncomfortably close to one another in a lot of ways) they are. So when those two combine there is often a ludicrous misapprehension about certain ‘things’ and their ostensible value in our lives. And while that’s bad, sometimes, for us as individuals, I think that in the long run the real problem lies with something much more profound.

What damage is done by scratching any particular consumer itch?

Problem is these days all of us have far more effect than we seem comfortable even acknowledging. Given the information we have in front of us it seems clear that each choice we make, no matter how small and seemingly banal, has an effect in the world. That purse you covet, the car you drive, the computer I’m working on right now have significant and sometimes tragic histories. Knowing what you can about how and why the ‘thing’ that you covet came into being is the first step in answering the most difficult of questions.

Is it worth it?

 

Posted on by tim in Fundamentals, Psycho-Fashion

2 Responses to On The Nature Of ‘Things’.

  1. megansense

    Great work Tim! My favourite part was the Donald Trump paragraph, I think you hit the nail on the head — when fame and fortune is all you’ve gotten to know, it is all you want, and for what? not security.

    I think there is some glamour behind buying an expensive brand, for sure, however I know when I buy things that are glamourous (which I use loosely because I can’t afford Gucci glamour) I think my satisfaction comes from being able to pay for it and earn it myself. Maybe then it is ok to scratch a consumer itch?

  2. di

    Tim, you pretty much described my thought process from, jesus, almost two years ago when we started this whole thing. I wanted to know why there was something in me that needed more than what I already have. And I already have a lot.
    To me it’s not about finding ‘enough’ anymore but it’s about finding satisfaction in what I have, and satisfaction in how I’ve acquired it.

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.